1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case as described in paragraph (2) below, and thus, the judgment of the court of first instance cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Parts to be dried;

A. According to the second instance judgment of the first instance court, the following from the third class “A” to the following first class “A” to the effect that “the four members of the first class vote in an indefinite name to dismiss the Plaintiff at full discretion,” the third class “Evidence A 1, 3, 4, 12 through 14” to the effect that “A evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 12 and 12” to the effect that “G organization” in the fourth class “I organization” to the effect that “the grounds for disciplinary action B, 3, and 3 grounds for disciplinary action” in the seventh class “B” to the effect that “the date on December 28, 2017,” and “the date on which December 28, 2017,” to the effect that “the date on which the fourth class action was taken on December 8, 2017” to the effect that “the date on which the disciplinary action was taken.”

B. On the third and third sides of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following parts shall be added, and the attached Form of the judgment shall be added at the end of the judgment of the court of first instance.

4) The summary of the defendant's employment rules and personnel management regulations concerning the instant case is as shown in the attached Form.

A person shall be appointed.

C. Once the judgment of the first instance is rendered, the following parts shall be added to the third and fourth parts below.

【No. The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff had been aware of any act that the Plaintiff had already become a cause for the disciplinary action and dismissal before the instant disciplinary committee was held, and accordingly, the instant disciplinary committee had sufficient explanatory measures against the cause for the disciplinary action. However, the Plaintiff’s testimony as stated in No. 20, No. 28, and No. 21-1 through No. 21-3, and witness D’s testimony as stated in No. 16, No. 16, No. 28, and No. 9 and No. 10 is difficult to believe it as it is, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise).

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition for reasons, and the remainder shall be dismissed for reasons.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion and the defendant's appeal is justified.