1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, even if the plaintiffs have considered both the allegations and evidence supplemented by the appellate court, and the plaintiffs have added additional judgments as to the allegations emphasized by the appellate court, and thus, it is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the allegations emphasized by the appellate court, thereby citing them pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 3rd written or added 17th 17th son of the judgment of the court shall be written by cutting "Plaintiff E" into "Plaintiff B;

판결문 4쪽 12행 다음에 『또한 원고들은, 오토바이의 뒷좌석 탑승자는 도로의 연석 등과의 충돌 시 튕겨져 나가 무방비 상태로 지면에 떨어지게 되므로 머리와 흉부 쪽에 중상을 입을 가능성이 매우 큰 반면, 운전자는 오토바이와 함께 끌려가면서 광범위한 부위에 경미한 상해를 입게 될 가능성이 매우 큰데, 망인이 혈흉 과다출혈로 사망한 반면, 피고 C는 광범위한 부위에 비교적 경미한 상해를 입는데 그쳤으므로 피고 C를 운전자로 보아야 한다고 주장한다.』를 추가한다.

Then, 5th 14th 14th 14th son's decision added "the deceased died with a scarcity scarcity, and in light of such reason of death, the deceased's collision with the curbstone, etc. of the road while driving the Otoba in the instant case, and the body was fireed in the future due to the shock, and the body was highly likely to inflict on the breast part of the steering gear, etc."

The 5th 16th 16th son of the judgment shall be written in accordance with the Agroopa.

The 5th 19th 19th 19th son of the judgment shall be written by Defendant C.

After the decision 6th 14th 14th son, the latter part of the decision is that "A defendant C was allowed to move only once on July 8, 2014, and the park is 4 to 5th wheeler with the last wheeler, and the latter part is facing the same as the last qui.