logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.24 2014가단198073
소유권이전등기 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' primary and conjunctive claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts without dispute;

A. “Seoul-si 1,907 No. 1,907” means 1912 (No. 45 years)

3.6. U.S. was registered in the Land Survey Board as the assessment titleholder, and the pertinent land was the land following the cadastral subdivision, land category change, unit conversion in front, administrative district change, etc. in the above land.

B. As shown in the annexed Table 1 (Family and Succession) of U’s inheritance relationship, U died on March 2, 1938 and succeeded to Australia V. On December 3, 1938, V died and succeeded to Australia Y. On April 28, 1977, WW deceased on April 28, 197, and the wife X and the surviving children were jointly succeeded, but X died on February 12, 2003, and the remaining Defendants, except the Defendant Republic of Korea, jointly succeeded to inherited property as shown in the annexed Table 2 (Calculation Table).

C.Y’s land ownership acquisition on March 6, 1912, YY indicated that the land was assessed on March 6, 1912, and was transferred to the Defendant’s Republic of Korea on August 31, 1959. In addition, the farmland distribution division drafted at the time of distribution of farmland under the former Farmland Reform Act included YY located in the “Seoul City” and the entire owner column of the repayment ledger also included Y located in the “Seoul City AA”.

Y in the Seoul Central District AB, Y filed a propane report with the confirmation of May 12, 1950, with the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2,391, 3278, Echeon-gun AC, including the land in this case, which proves that each farmland is actually owned by it. d.

Defendant H, in relation to the land of this case, filed a claim for cancellation of registration of ownership preservation at Suwon District Court 2008Kadan308, Suwon District Court 2008Kadan308, on the ground of each claim, for the completion of the prescription of possession on January 1, 1980 and around December 31, 199, after 20 years from January 1, 198.

(hereinafter “Prior Action Litigation”). In the aforesaid prior Action, the foregoing prior Action is required.

arrow