logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단2534
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents at the E’s residence located in Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, in the real estate lease agreement, with an official seal affixed to the real estate lease agreement, stating that “I” is “I” on the real estate location column, “I million won” on the deposit column, “I million won” on the remainder column, “I million won” on August 31, 2015 on the date of preparation, and “I” on the lessor’s address column, “F on the G phone number column,” and “I” on the lessor’s resident registration number column.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising, forged the I's private document on rights and obligations, which is a private document, in the name of the I.

2. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) lent money from L at the K office located in the Daegu Suwon-gu JJ on March 7, 2016; and (b) delivered the forged real estate lease agreement to L who is unaware of the circumstances, as if it were duly formed.

Accordingly, the Defendant exercised the above forged real estate lease contract under the name of I.

3. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant, at the K office located in the Daegu Suwon-gu J on March 7, 2016, presented a forged real estate lease contract to L, as described in paragraph (1), and concluded that “The Defendant would make a false statement that “The Defendant would make a reimbursement within one month after lending KRW 5 million as the deposit is five million.”

However, there is no fact that the Defendant operated multiples, and the real estate lease contract was forged as above, and there is no more than five million won of the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, and even if he borrowed money from the victim with no specific property, he did not have any ability or intent to repay the debt at all.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is deceiving him.

arrow