All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendants were in conflict with each other, and the defendants and their families cannot reject the credibility of the consistent statements. In full view of other evidence, the defendants committed each of the acts stated in the facts charged in the instant case. Therefore, the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the records of this case: ① at the court of the court below, the 1st century stated that Defendant A was destroyed on its own by her own initiative; ② at the time of the police investigation, P did not coincide with this part of the facts charged by the victim's statement; ② at the court of the court below on January 30, 2014, there were no assault on the part of the court of the court below; ② at around 22:0, P stated that Defendant A was able to take a police vehicle and went to the hospital. At the court of the court of the court below, P stated that Defendant A was 1 and 2 did not have a physical assault at the time of the police investigation; ④ At the time of the court of the court below's decision, P stated that Defendant A was 1 and 3 did not appear to have a new wall at the time of the police investigation, and that there was no physical assault on the part of the court of the court below's decision that Defendant A was 1 and 1 other than the victim's new wall at the time of the court of the first instance.