logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 10. 04. 선고 2018두47967 판결
(심리불속행) 양도소득세 신고서 제출행위에는 어떠한 적극적 은닉의도가 없으므로 국세부과제척기간 5년이 적용됨[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2017Nu65410 ( March 23, 2018)

Title

(C) If there is no active concealment intention in the filing of the capital gains tax return, five years have passed from the exclusion period of national tax.

Summary

(2) The court below held that the transfer tax return submitted by the plaintiffs cannot be deemed as reference material to help the tax authorities understand the transfer tax return, and even if there is any error or omission in the report, it cannot be deemed as a non-report. The submission of the transfer income tax return does not have any positive intent, and it is applied 5 years of the exclusion period

Related statutes

Article 26-2 of the National Tax Basic Act

Cases

2018Du47967 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

○○ 1 other

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

on October 23, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

October 04, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Trial Procedure, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow