logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.11.20 2015고단3092
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On September 14, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) (U.S.) (U.S. driver’s license without a driver’s license on 05:40 on September 14, 2015, 4 lanes ahead of the long distance in the central station located in the high-speed of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle according to good faith while driving the motor vehicle to a person engaged in driving.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received the front part of the victim C's D's DNA driving which was in progress from the right side of the course of the collision to the left side of the vehicle driving signal due to the negligence that led directly to the vehicle stop signal, and received the front part of the above franchise from the right side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time escaped without any necessary measures, such as stopping and providing relief to the victim, even though he damaged the above 300,000 won of scrap metal.

2. The Defendant: (a) attempted to conceal the above facts at the above time and place; (b) asked E, an E, who is the NAE, to make a statement that he would have caused an accident while driving the said car; and (c) allowed E to make a false confession.

Therefore, the Defendant made a false statement to the police officer who could not know the name of the Defendant dispatched to the Republic of Korea around that time, to the effect that E had sent the above traffic accident, and the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, around 06:30 on the same day, the police officer, who could not know his name in the guard and traffic of the Gyeonggisan National Police Station, and in the office of the investigation team of the Gyeonggi National Police Station, sent E

Accordingly, the defendant is the above E.

arrow