beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 22,00,000 and Defendant B with full payment from September 4, 2014.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant B is a licensed real estate agent, and the Defendant Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid business entity which has entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant B on the liability for damages caused by a brokerage accident.
B. On September 6, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with D, the owner of the studio building in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant building”) with respect to the instant building 403, which stipulated the lease agreement from September 28, 201 to September 27, 201, with regard to the lease deposit of KRW 47 million and the period from September 28, 2011.
C. Nonparty E, F, and G (hereinafter “Nonindicteds”) did not have an economic ability to purchase a publicly announced source building, with the intention of purchasing old publicly announced source at a low price in the first place in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City H H H, and remodelling it into a studio by remodelling it into a studio. Pursuant to a sales contract and concluding a sales contract by paying a down payment, and paying a balance after receiving a loan as security, it was difficult for the remodeling project to pay the construction cost as the deposit by leasing it on credit in the form of a lease with a deposit of KRW 40 million from KRW 40 million to KRW 50 million, and then purchasing an additional publicly announced source building with a down payment. D.
Defendant B accepted the above plan from the above-mentioned plan from the above-mentioned F, along with the proposal that the non-party is in general in charge of the management and lease of the public official building to be purchased.
E. Defendant B and the Nonparty, around April 22, 2010, purchased the 24 foot studio building located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and remodeled it into the 24 foot studio building, “J”, and Defendant B, upon which they had 3-5 households out of the total households and paid the construction cost as the deposit for the lease on a monthly basis to those who want to rent the 24 foot studio, and they deceptioned that there would be no problem to refund the deposit for the lease on a monthly basis, and then, 19 households out of 24 households are transferred.