1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 3, 1916, Y was found to have been found to have been 3 5 parts of H forest land among each of the instant real estate, Y was divided into the real estate listed in [Attachment 1 and 2].

On the other hand, on the other hand, the J-1-one 1-one g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

B. On February 27, 1971, B, C, and G completed registration of initial ownership relating to 1/3 of each of the instant real estates.

(However, at the time of registration of preservation of ownership, the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list in paragraph (2) of the same Table was “three single square meters in Haak-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do,” “511 square meters in 1,511 square meters in 51 square meters in YY-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the real estate listed in paragraph (3) of the same list was “6,469 square meters in Jin-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do,” and the real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the same list was “1,200 square meters in Y-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-

G was deceased on March 29, 1985, and on January 11, 1993, Defendant F and D (former AD), the heir of G, completed the registration of ownership transfer for shares of 3/24 shares of each real estate listed in [Attachment 3 and 4], and Defendant E completed the registration of ownership transfer for shares of 2/24 due to inheritance.

【Ground of recognition】 Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1, 8, and 20 (including provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff is a clan (A) of which the plaintiff L 31 years old M is the Jung-si.

On February 27, 1971, the Plaintiff held title trust with each of the 1/3 shares in each of the instant real estate to B, C, and G, which is a clan.

On March 29, 1985, the Defendants succeeded to the status of the title trustee with respect to each real estate of the instant case while accepting the shares of G in relation to each real estate of this case.

The Plaintiff, through the service of a duplicate of the instant complaint, declared the Defendants to terminate the title trust.

Therefore, the Defendants are therefore.