1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 20, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) felled on the floor of air-conditioning agreement lines at the construction site of the Guideology Hospital (hereinafter “the instant disaster”); and (b) diagnosed “a light-wise air-conditioning, the right side side part and the back side part; (c) minated minton, the right side part and the right side part; and (d) diagnosed the Defendant’s re-medical care around that time.”

B. On March 9, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) diagnosed the “Saeong-si Office” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”); and (b) applied for additional medical care for injury and disease to the Defendant on May 18, 2012.

In regard to this, the Defendant was under the conditions of the Plaintiff’s hearing immediately after the instant accident, and the point at which the Plaintiff’s right-hand office first occurred is confirmed to be around September to October 201 in the medical record, so it is difficult to recognize causation between the instant disaster and the instant injury and the injury and disease, and the non-approval disposition on June 4, 2012 was issued.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] Class A 1, 4, and 7

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff did not have received treatment from the office before the disaster of this case, not from both the office and the office suffered from the right side of the disaster of this case, but from the two parts of the accident of this case, the office left the right side of the disaster of this case, but there were difficulties in hearing to the right side of the disaster of this case, and there were several months after the accident, and there were cases after the accident, and there is no possibility that the office was aware of the office after the accident, even though the accident occurred after the considerable period of time due to the defect of recognition function, it cannot be ruled out that the office of hearing and hearing room of the plaintiff's right side of this case caused the second damage.

(b) The terms used in this Act under the related Acts and subordinate statutes shall be defined as follows:

1. The term "occupational accident" means an injury, disease, disability, or accident of a worker caused by an occupational reason;