logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.04.18 2015구단21363
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On November 27, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “galphical signboard escape certificate accompanied by the nephal ppuri disease certificate,” and received medical care until April 13, 2012, and completed medical treatment.

(Class 11 No. 7). On April 2, 2015, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant for a lower-hand hand’s right, etc., and applied for additional injury and disease as an applicant’s disease.

On May 6, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to grant additional injury and injury and injury and injury to the Plaintiff on the ground that there are symptoms, such as telegraph low-car and knee-free symptoms, against the Plaintiff, and the causal link between additional injury and injury and injury and disease.

(2) On July 28, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a request for review on the ground that “The symptoms alleged by the Plaintiff were unrelated to the approved injury and the applicable injury, and thus, it cannot be recognized that there is a proximate causal relation between the disaster or approved injury and the applicant injury.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 4, 5, Eul evidence 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff suffered pain due to telegraphic picture, telegraph pain, reduction of memory, salivism, severe changes, disguised disorders, bridged string, inner string, and string stale, etc., and in particular, the pain and salved phenomenon of mersh is getting worse.

Since it is necessary to undergo a procedure for the reduction of pain and normal life, the instant disposition should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

B. Determination additional medical care benefits are recognized in cases where an injury or disease already caused by an occupational accident is additionally discovered, or where medical care is necessary due to a new disease caused by an injury or disease caused by an occupational accident (Article 49 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act). Article 49 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act only applies to cases where symptoms alleged by the Plaintiff are additionally discovered from an injury or disease caused by an occupational accident

or a business accident.

arrow