logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.08.12 2014고단1572
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the instant facts charged, the violation of the Labor Standards Act.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Busan District Court on September 13, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 13, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, “2014 Highest 1572”, the victim E, the vice-chairperson of D, and the Defendant has been subject to influence and connection with the above company, including: (a) the victim was scheduled to commit a fraudulent act of the president of the SPC Group, a company, with his/her own name and name, and (b) the victim was attending the meeting.

1. On November 7, 2013, the Defendant, at around 17:00, made a false statement to the effect that “If there is a place where the Paris store chain is located in a mutually unclaimed restaurant located in the Busan metropolitan transportation Daegu dong, the Defendant would give him first to the victim, who first asks him, to leave the place. As such, the Defendant would have to pay 20 million won to the Defendant for the first floor of the Home Puger’s shipping unit and to move out, then the Defendant would have the employee if he would pay 20 million won to him.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to use the money received from the victim as operating expenses of the Defendant company, and the Defendant was merely an operator of F, a cooperation company of the SPC Group, and did not have the ability to arrange for the Paris store store store at the GPC marine transportation store. Therefore, even if the Defendant received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to establish a place to open the Paris store for the victim.

Accordingly, on November 8, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 20 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant.

2. On November 19, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “The payment shall be made to the subcontractor. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 20,000,00,000, it will have to be repaid ten (10) days thereafter.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant is about KRW 550,000,000, and about KRW 500,000,000.

arrow