(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.02.02 2017고정1320

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.02.02 2017고정1320

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who works as the head of the partnership in the redevelopment and consolidation project association for D houses located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju.

On March 7, 2016, the Defendant, using a computer installed in the office of the D Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association on the second floor of the building in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, to access the Internet site to the next DDR (F) car page and the victim G did not interfere with the partnership business, he/she would appoint an attorney to claim damages against the owner of the G land, etc. due to interference with partnership business, etc.

“The reputation of the victim” is damaged by openly putting false information.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case; G was claimed for disclosure of information about the D Housing Redevelopment Project Association (hereinafter “Union”) from July 2010 to July 2015; on the basis of this, a number of criminal complaints against the Defendant, who is the president of the union, and some of the charges was found to have been ordered for summary order or suspension of indictment, but a considerable portion of the charges was terminated as “no suspicion”; on March 7, 2016, the board of directors was held in the presence of the Defendant and six directors, who are the president of the union of this case, and the said board of directors could interfere with the business of the association based on the contents consulted with the attorney-at-law.

On March 18, 2016, when posting the agenda items and resolutions of the board of directors on March 7, 2016 on the Internet site of the instant association through the employees of the instant association, the Defendant decided to appoint an attorney-at-law to claim compensation for damages due to interference with partnership affairs, etc., and make a decision on civil litigation by appointing an attorney-at-law to claim compensation for damages, such as interfering with partnership affairs.

“The point indicated”, etc.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2018.05.23 2018노587

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.10.27 2017고정890

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.08.25 2017고정677

-서울서부지방법원 2018.01.29 2017고합102

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.10 2018고합573