logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.10 2018고합573
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
Text

Defendant

B Imprisonment with prison labor of 5 years and fine of 100 million won, Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor of 1 year and 6 months and fine of 15 million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On November 10, 2016, the District Court was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence of imprisonment for the crime of acceptance of bribe at the District Court on August 21, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 21, 2017.

"2018 Gohap 573"

1. Defendant A’s acceptance of bribe is a co-titled professional hub that connects companies such as relocation management and removal to partnership with the officers of a housing redevelopment and reconstruction improvement project association and takes monetary profits from such companies in return.

Co-Defendant B (hereafter referred to as “B” in this paragraph) is a general director of the D Apartment Housing Reconstruction Improvement Association (hereafter referred to as the “Association” in this case) in order to implement a project with the authorization for the establishment of the Association on March 4, 2009, and E is a representative of F Co., Ltd., a service company that performs general assembly execution, etc. in relation to housing redevelopment and reconstruction improvement projects.

Defendant

A was a director of the instant association at the time through the introduction of G around December 2015.

B was aware of the fact that it is necessary for B to neglect the forfeited rights of the union, and the Defendant A had been able to neglect B and the association, and Defendant A, along with B, intended to dismiss I, who is the president of the association at the time at the Chinese cafeteria, which is in the city of Gu-si, the city of Gu-si, and to attract new companies to move management and general assembly agency service companies to easily hear their horses in order to benefit from various interests and interests.

To E, all the general assembly contracts opened in D Apartment Association will be concluded with E in the future, if they success in the general assembly that is to dismiss I who is the current president of the partnership and to make J as the president of the partnership.

“Proposal” and E accepted the proposal.

Accordingly, around July 14, 2016, at the special meeting of the above union, B and Defendant A were newly elected as the president of the association, and B were also elected as the president of the association.

arrow