The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was that the Defendant did not force the victim E to commit an indecent act as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment, and did not assault the victim E and F.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence examined by the lower court regarding the grounds for appeal, the Defendant’s indecent act by force against the victim D as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment and assaulted the victim E and F.

The lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the judgment.

1) On the part of indecent act by compulsion, the victim consistently testified from the investigative agency to the original trial court that the Defendant had her her tack, and thereby his her fry, such as male-child E, etc., and his her body fighting between the Defendant and the Defendant.

B) Although the victim stated that he was unable to view the Defendant’s her her her her her her her her her her her her but, it is extremely natural that the Defendant was her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her but her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her but her her her her her her her her her her her

Furthermore, the above E was immediately behind the Defendant’s act, so it was possible to see the Defendant’s act accurately. L appears to have observed since the Defendant’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her