1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. Defendant B’s grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and Defendant A, a corporation, did not disclose the grounds for appeal by the date of closing argument in the instant case

Even if the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court of first instance submitted by the defendant B to this court, the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) except where “the Defendant Company enters into the instant contract from the fourth to the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance,” and “the Defendant Company enters into the instant contract between the Defendant Company and the Defendant Company,” the ground for the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b)

2. If so, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable for dispute as to the existence or scope of the obligation of each of the Defendants from January 30, 2016 to January 19, 2017, which is the date following the delivery date of a copy of the application for the payment order of this case, and the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the amount of damages for delay at a rate of 25,059,363 per annum under the Commercial Act and 15% per annum under the Special Act on the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment. The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified within the scope of each of the above grounds, and each of the remainder is dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair, and the judgment of the court of first instance cannot be dismissed because only part of the Defendant’s appeal is without merit.