1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the relevant part after being dismissed as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance (Articles 11 through 15 on the second side) shall be written in the following manner:

“B.” On May 25, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) performed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant apartment site located in Gyeyang-si P on the ground of free transfer; (b) on May 26, 2016, the registration of ownership transfer and the registration of cancellation of trust registration on the ground of reversion of trust property on the instant apartment site, including Tayang-si Q., the instant apartment site; (c) on June 7, 2016, the registration of cancellation due to the implementation of land development projects; (d) on the instant apartment site; (e) on June 17, 2016, the registration of ownership preservation on the instant apartment site; (e) on the instant apartment site, the registration of ownership transfer on the instant apartment site; (e) on June 15, 2016 to July 8, 2016; and (e) on behalf of the Plaintiff, the purport of the registration number No. 261 through No. 161, May 16, 2016.

The part 3(b) of the judgment of the first instance court (from 7th to 8th 2) shall be written in the following manner:

『나. 이 사건 아파트와 그 부지에 관한 소유권보존등기(㉲, ㉳항 관련)와 인감증명서 발급대행(㉴항 관련 처리용역의 유ㆍ무상 여부 살피건대, 피고의 주장에 부합하는 듯한 제1심 증인 O의 증언은 믿지 아니하고, 앞서 본 인정사실 및 증거들을 종합하여 알 수 있는 아래와 같은...