1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this judgment are as follows: (a) part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited as “paragraph (2)”; and (b) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the judgment of the plaintiff as “paragraph (3)” under the following, thereby citing it by the main text

2. Parts to be dried;

(a) The part concerning Defendant B’s respective “Defendant B” of the second and twenty instances of the judgment of the first instance court shall be described as “Defendant B Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial.”

B. Part 13 of the 2nd judgment of the court of first instance in the part of “of the instant land” has been written “of the adjoining D lots of land.”

(c)not more than 20 of the second decision of the first instance shall include the following:

A person shall be appointed.

E. Meanwhile, the co-defendant B died on February 19, 2016, which was after the pronouncement of the judgment of the first instance court, and the co-inheritors and the above I, J, K, and L took over the instant lawsuit in the first instance court.

A person shall be appointed.

(d) Part 10 of the 3rd judgment of the first instance court "20 million won and damages for delay thereof" shall be written by "each money, such as the entries in the above claim."

E. The part of the fourth sentence of the first instance court’s decision “in light of this point,” written by the following: “In light of this point, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to the trial and the circumstances surrounding the assertion are considered.”

F. On the fourth 13th 13th eth 13th eth 13th eth eth eth 4, “In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings, evidence No. 4-3 and evidence No. 11 through No. 15, each entry No. 4-3 and No. 11 through No. 15,” the part

G. On November 18, 1998, the Plaintiff’s farm facilities and operation rights prior to 1998 relating to the lease of land (such as the above D) between the above B and the fourth 16-17 of the judgment of the first instance.