The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) discovered a Mat Calculation Unit (defast); and (c) found a Mat Mat Mat Mat Mat Mat Ma; and (d) returned to the next State; and (c) returned to the customer Centre, the Defendant had the intent of unlawful acquisition.

It is difficult to see it.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the Defendant’s transfer of the items calculated to a camera, and then putting them into one’s bank naturally and naturally, in which the Defendant was placed on the card settlement machine (which seems to be a very high-priced thing). ② The Defendant cannot find out the head of how the Defendant should be faced in CCTV images (one wave: 54 Do44.6) and CCTV images (one wave: 15 Do54 Do48.6), and 03:33 parts of the CCTV images (one wave: hereinafter “48.6”), 33 parts of the judgment below that the Defendant exceeded the Defendant’s legal staff and the Defendant did not look at the victim’s whereabouts despite having discovered the loss of the items by the Defendant as the Defendant’s side.

(4) If the defendant thought that he was the owner of a wall, it is not necessary to find up to the customer center as alleged by the defendant. (The defendant's subsequent statement is only one (CCTV image) or two (2) (the court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's court's decision