1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or additions. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. From No. 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, “The above-mentioned B and C were included in the project area, and were divided into B, F, G, H, I, J, and K on July 31, 1975, and C were divided into five parcels, and the subsequent use status was as follows: “The above-mentioned B and C were divided into five parcels, excluding the above-mentioned land owned by the Plaintiff, and the remaining parcels, excluding the above-mentioned land, i.e., the land was divided into five parcels, C, M, N, andO, and the subsequent use status was as follows.” From 20th of the judgment of the first instance, “The land was divided into five separate parcels, i.e., the first instance court 6th of the judgment of the second instance, i., the ownership of the remaining parcels, i.e., the remaining parcels, i., the ownership of the land before and after the first instance court 20th of the judgment.”