A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 7, 2016, the Defendant marks D’s husband C at around January 27, 2016 a photographed that D’s vehicle was installed in the apartment parking lot B around January 27, 2016. At that time D was located in the house B; hereinafter the same shall apply. around September 19, 2016, the Defendant considered “Yansando” as stated in the Yongsan-dong written indictment, in which B and E reading groups are located, as it appears that D’s vehicle was only in the vicinity of a clerical error.

It will also meet D's day.

On October 6, 2016, at the next apartment store B's apartment around B, the E, F, G, and H came up until they were returned home, and at the 1st day of the new wall D showed that D will go in front of B.

B and D review their personal I.

In this circumstance, it is confirmed that there are many people in the two cases.

I think that there is a clear gap between the two.

‘The honor of the victim D' was damaged by publicly alleging false facts.

2. On October 8, 2016, the Defendant, in collusion with E and F on October 8, 2016, damaged the victim D and B’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts with L and M as described in paragraph 1, in the residence of Ulsan Northern-gu J building and K. F.

3. On April 2017, the Defendant damaged the victim D and B’s honor by openly pointing out false facts to N, as described in paragraph (1), at the insular hospital located in Daegu or below Daegu, with the content of paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement on the fifth trial date in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against theO, F, or E;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes to P, B, N, Q and L

1. Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307(2) of the same Act (in the case of Article 2 at the time of sale, hereinafter “Article 30”) regarding criminal facts and the selection of each fine

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the married couple, who was the complainant, was suffering from considerable mental confusion and pain due to the examination of the defendant's husband and wife.