logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2013.06.20 2013재고합1 (1)
대통령긴급조치제9호위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. According to the summary of the facts charged and the records of the instant case, the following facts are recognized.

A. The summary of the facts charged against the defendant is that the defendant was detained by the charge of violating the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9, and was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same crime at the Seoul District Criminal Court on February 10, 1978, and filed an appeal on June 19, 1978 by the Seoul High Court sentenced the suspension of qualification for one year for the same crime and sentenced the suspension of qualification for one year at the Seoul High Court on September 26, 1978, and the decision of dismissal of appeal was made by the Supreme Court on September 26, 1978. On June 26, 1978. On June 17:30, 1978, the defendant argued that the defendant’s act was distortd with the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 4, 101, 101, 101, 101, 15, 100, 19, 10, 10, 10, 15, 30, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3, etc.

B. In the case of the judgment of conviction and the judgment of Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon Daejeon District Court on March 6, 1979, the defendant was convicted of all the charges and sentenced one year of imprisonment and one year of suspension of qualification against the defendant (hereinafter “the judgment of retrial”), and the defendant appealed against this judgment, but the Seoul High Court dismissed the above appeal as of June 13, 1979, and the judgment of retrial became final and conclusive upon the waiver of the appeal by the defendant.

C. The specific facts charged in the judgment subject to an emergency action No. 9 applied to the Defendant’s act are as follows.

arrow