1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,273,788 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 31, 2013 to February 16, 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Nonparty B, who concluded an insurance contract with the Defendant, entered into on January 31, 2013 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) Nonparty B, around 09:10 on January 31, 2013 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

2) On the other hand, on the other hand, two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-dimensional side of the two-dimensional side of the two-dimensional side of the two-lane village.

(i)D Unmanned car (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicle”) driven by the Plaintiff running in the direction of one-lane from the vicinity of the above road while making a right-hand route in the direction of one-way.

2) The Plaintiff’s vehicle was concealed as it did not discover and entered the said road into the first lane (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as damage to other institutions within the mouth, which requires four weeks of medical treatment, due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 14 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as an insurer.

C. In full view of the facts of recognition of the above limitation of liability, Gap evidence Nos. 14 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence No. 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is recognized that the plaintiff did not take proper measures, such as speeding off from the back road to the road of this case to avoid drilling with the defendant's vehicle that entered the road of this case, and thus, the defendant's responsibility is limited to 90% in consideration of these points.

(A) The defendant asserts that the plaintiff did not wear a safety bell, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it). 2. In addition to the items separately stated below the scope of liability for damages, the corresponding items in the attached Form of damages calculation table shall be the same as each corresponding item, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but the amount of less than the last month and less than

The current price calculation at the time of the accident is based on the rate of 5/12 per month.