logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.23 2013가단126019
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant paid KRW 33,913,848 to the Plaintiff KRW 5% per annum from June 26, 2012 to January 23, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On June 26, 2012, B: (a) C Vehicles around 13:17 (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”)

) While driving the Plaintiff and making a left-hand of the shooting distance of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public parking lot for Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government (the intersection between the two-lane road and the one-lane road), which is one-lane road in the Hancheon-gu, the one-lane road, which is the two-lane road, the two-lane road in the way way, the part on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s driving, who was straight from the Han River-dong, the two-lane road in the above part of the two-lane road, overlaps with the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer from the injury of the driver’s driver’s injury (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. However, the limitation of liability is limited to 80% of the defendant's liability by taking into account all the circumstances such as the circumstances of the accident in this case, even though it is necessary for the plaintiff to pay attention to the traffic situation of other vehicles in proceeding the intersection of this case where traffic is not controlled by signal apparatus.

(20% of the Plaintiff’s negligence ratio). Meanwhile, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff was negligent at the time of the instant accident, but the submitted evidence alone is insufficient to recognize it. Thus, the above assertion is rejected.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed damages calculation sheet shall be the same, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but shall be less than the last month and KRW 1.

arrow