logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.11 2013누32658
유족보상및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The second 8-9 of "A." part shall be described as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

A. E (FF students; hereinafter “the deceased”) served as a mining source in G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) from May 10, 1973 to August 31, 1982, and as a cooperation firm in G for about five years thereafter, in G, as an employee for coal transport and open coal adjustment for about twelve years.

In the third 4 to 5th [Ground for Recognition], “A’s 8 evidence is added.” The 6th 1st 1st am deleted “the disease”. The part “A’s 7th am” was added to “the ground for recognition” in the 9th 1st 3th am, and the part “the Deceased, like the above, had worked as an employee in the mine for about 26 years from May 10, 1973 to the 9th am “the Deceased,” and the part “the Deceased, like the first am, has worked as an employee in the mine for about 26 years from May 10, 1973.” The fact inquiry was accompanied by a video picture, but the fact inquiry was also difficult to determine that the disease was a type of pneumoconiosis pursuant to the above medical examination report; the same applies to the fact inquiry conducted at the court of first 7th am also to the fact inquiry.”

On the other hand, "in addition" is added.

2. The decision of the first instance court is justified, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow