1. The defendant,

A. 38,249,800 won to Plaintiff A, 28,434,900 won to Plaintiff C, and 27,758,900 won to Plaintiff E and each of the above.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: A project to create a Bogeumjari Housing District (G1 and secondary projects; hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): A public notice given by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on June 3, 2009, as published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 27, 2010 - A project operator: Defendant

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on October 19, 2012 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) - Land to be expropriated: The same shall apply to the description in the column of “property subject to expropriation” in attached Table 2.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands,” and individually referred to as “instant lands,” depending on the parcel number - Compensation for losses: The phrase “amount of adjudication for expropriation” in attached Table 2 is as indicated.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on December 12, 2012 - An appraisal corporation: G (1st appraisal corporation), the appraisal corporation, the G (2nd appraisal corporation), the G (2nd appraisal corporation) the appraisal corporation, the G (2nd appraisal corporation), the joint appraisal corporation in charge of a dispute resolution

C. The Central Land Tribunal made an objection on July 18, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant objection”) by the Central Land Tribunal (hereinafter “the instant adjudication”), and the content of the adjudication (hereinafter “each of the instant adjudication”), including the said adjudication of acceptance and the said adjudication of objection: The content of the adjudication is as indicated in the “amount of the objection” column in attached Table 2.

- An appraisal corporation: A certified public appraisal corporation which is the date of a dispute resolution, the central appraisal appraisal corporation of the country of a dispute resolution, and the appraisal appraisal corporation which has been a dispute resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution resolution

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs B, C, D, E, and F allegedly asserted that the land owned by the above plaintiffs constituted a portion assessed as a road or ditch different from the land category of the land owned by the above plaintiffs, and thus, they should be assessed and compensated before the land category at the time of incorporation into a road or ditch.