Plast Entertainment Co., Ltd. (Law Firm LLC, Attorneys Sung-soo et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Seoul Regional Tax Office

March 10, 2017

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2015Guhap79192 decided September 22, 2016

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

On April 1, 2014, the Defendant’s notice of change in each income amount listed in attached Form 1, which was issued against the Plaintiff, shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this judgment is the same as that of the first instance court, and therefore, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (Supreme Court Decision 2007Du16561 Decided October 29, 2009 cited by the Defendant).

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment]

Judges Kim Jong-hee (Presiding Judge)