A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

From around 2006, the Defendant is a person who operates a C fishery partnership corporation specialized in the production and distribution of the former uniforms in the Gun B.

1. On November 20, 2015, the Defendant against the victim D would pay the victim 10 days later than the 10th day of the eastdo-do-Eup, North Korea-do-Eup, North Korea-do-Eup, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, even if the outstanding amount that the Defendant failed to pay to another customer from around 2014 was in total 250 million won and was sold to the merchant of the uniform supplied by the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the outstanding amount to the victim from time to time, since he did not have the intention or ability to pay it to the other transaction party first.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim, and that deceivings the victim from the victim, i.e., the 45.7 million won from the seat.

2. On March 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim E paid the amount to the victim within seven (7) days from the date on which he/she supplied the uniform to the victim from the Seoul High-gun F.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price at the time, even if he was recovered from the damaged person due to the circumstances such as Paragraph 1.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim, and that deceivings the victim from the victim, i.e., the 4,4820,000 won from the seat.

3. The defrauded of the Victim G by telephone on July 2015, the Defendant would pay the victim “the first day of the first day of the supply of the entire uniform, which would result in the two-time supply of the entire uniform, immediately following the next day, and the second two-way delivery value would be paid later than three days.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price at the time, even if he was recovered from the damaged person due to the circumstances such as Paragraph 1.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is left before August 10, 2015 from the victim.