Cases that do not constitute an exaggerated advertisement under the Medical Service Act

의학박사의 학위를 가진 자가 그의 의원 출입문 상단에 “의학박사 전문의 ㅇㅇㅇ피부비뇨과의원”이라고 쓴 아크릴 간판을 걸어 놓은 행위는 의료법 제46조 , 의료법시행규칙 제33조 에서 말하는 과대광고에 해당한다고 볼 수 없다.

Article 46 of the Medical Service Act, Article 33 of the Enforcement Rule of the Medical Service Act

Plaintiff

Attorney Park Jae-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Seoul High Court Decision 75Gu292 delivered on April 25, 1978

The appeal is dismissed. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The defendant's attorney's grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the judgment of the court below, the plaintiff, who is a medical person with a doctor's degree in medical science, is found to post an Acrypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's crypter's 2nd floor of the original city, and such a content cannot be viewed as an exaggerated advertisement under Article 46 of the Medical Service Act

Therefore, this paper is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kang Jeong-hee (Presiding Justice)