Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant, who suffered injury and damage to property, took part in the victim C (n, 38 years of age) and sacrifies, around 20:0 on July 18, 2016, the Defendant provided meals to the victim at a cafeteria located in the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government ambandong.
On July 18, 2016, at around 22:40 on July 18, 2016, the Defendant, along with the victim in the digital media entertainment station located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was arguing that the victim gets a D taxi along with the victim and went to the street in front of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and brought a dispute on the ground that the victim is disregarding the defendant without being able to obtain the Defendant’s telephone, and went out of the taxi where the victim’s head, face, arms, etc. were taken away from the taxi where the victim was deducted from the victim’s smartphone. At around 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant was able to take the victim’s head debt, and take head, face, arms, etc. into drinking.
As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as catitiss that need to be treated for about two weeks, and damaged by preventing the victim from finding one smartphone owned by the victim with a market value of at least 1.1 million won, and impairing its utility.
2. On July 18, 2016, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) around 23:10 on the front road of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul and 112 reported and took place; (b) G police boxes affiliated with the Seoul Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western Police Station Police Station: (c) dump the Defendant’s flabbbb, flaps of the defective G police box, flabing him/her about 112 on the left part; (d) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case; and (e) inflicted injury on G, such as damage to the character of the left bridge, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement concerning C and G;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;
1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destruction and damage of property), and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.