1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this Court is as follows, in addition to dismissal or addition, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

1. The second 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd

② Article 2 of the Addenda to the Rules on Housing Supply (No. 167, Sept. 17, 2009) provides that "the amended provisions of Article 29 (4) of the Addenda to the Rules on Housing Supply (No. 167, Sept. 17, 2009) shall apply from the first public announcement of invitation of invitation of invitation of invitation of invitation of invitation of invitation of invitation of invitation of residents after the enforcement of these Rules." However, the title of the above supplementary provisions provides that "the case concerning special supply of houses for multi-child households" is specified in the scope of the application. Since there is no evidence to regard the lease contract of this case as the special supply of houses for multi-child households, the defendant's assertion of exclusion of retroactive application of Article 29

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.