logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.21 2014나38779
사해행위취소 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

In light of the above legal principles, it is reasonable to view that the tax accounting amount of KRW 700,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 70,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 2,00,00,00,00,00.

C) On November 4, 2009, AB transferred KRW 200 million to the LA development account (National Bank, 41***************30 on November 6, 2009, respectively. D) with respect to the flow of the above funds, the Plaintiff prepared a statement stating that ① on October 19, 2009 as of the date of preparation, the sum of KRW 5 billion (=4.6 billion from the Investment Fund, KRW 4.4 billion from the Loan, KRW 4.6 billion from the Loan), and KRW 400 million from the Loan ($ 4.4 billion from the Loan), ② on November 9, 2009, KRW 400 million from the Investment Fund with the details of the funds deposited, KRW 4.4 billion from the Investment Fund operation, and KRW 400 million from the internal account.

① In the case of the above letter of approval, J,O, and AF signed the letter of approval, but at the time of signature, J signed the said letter of approval with the meaning that it received KRW 5 billion, but did not verify the details thereof.O was not the representative of E at the time, and only entered E office, and was not aware of the specific financial situation of E, and AF was not aware of the specific financial situation of E. The AF was a daily golf club at the time.

arrow