The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates C's boat and boat.

At around 10:00 on November 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) knowingly harvested the wals of the victim E (59 years of age) with the knowledge of the fact that F, the head of the Working Group on Calsalsging C, which was harvested by confusion of the orchard, had the victim’s possession of 1,200,000 won, erroneously harvested the wals of 60,000 won of the market price of the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A E-document;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation (related to witness's statement, etc. of a motor vehicle in the vicinity of the damaged place) and reporting internal investigation;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the defendant denies the crime, but deposits the amount equivalent to the amount of damage for the victim, the first offender, and the circumstances that may be considered in the course of the crime in this case): The judgment as to the allegation of

1. The Defendant alleged that he did not instruct G to enter crusal wrusscruscruscruscruscrus with his leader, and G did not report this. As such, the Defendant did not have any intention to larceny.

2. The criminal intention of larceny is the perception that the ownership of another person possessed by the latter is transferred to him/herself or to a third person against his/her will;

이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 G은 수사기관에서부터 이 법정에 이르기까지 작업반장인 F이 과수원을 혼동하여 작업을 하고 있던 피해자의 과수원으로 가서 피고인에게 전화하여 작업반장이 과수원을 착각하여 감귤을 잘못 땄다고 보고하였고...