logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.11.25 2015나496
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

Plaintiff’s assertion

The Plaintiff and the Defendant purchased on March 19, 2014, calculated walk walk walk 27,00 g and unit price 2,700 g per kg, and purchased 3,100,000 won for 76,00,000 won in addition to the incidental expenses, and subsequently returned the amount calculated as KRW 2,700 per kg where the yield falls short of 27,000 g.

However, since actual yield is only 21,549km, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 14,717,700 won [2,700 won X5,451kg (27,000km - 21,549k) and damages for delay.

According to the statement of Gap evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the fact that the plaintiff remitted KRW 76,00,000 to the defendant is recognized.

However, the Plaintiff and the Defendant purchased 27,000 g citrus from the Defendant in 76,000,000, and if the Defendant’s citrus citrus citrus citrus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus crus cru

1. Each entry of 2, 8, 9-1 through 7, 10, 11-1 through 3 is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to prove it otherwise.

In addition, there is no objective evidence to prove that wals wals wals wals wals wals wals 21,549g actually harvested from each of the above lands.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is concluded, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow