Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for one year, respectively.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who was serving as a public official of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office by December 2, 2015 and retired from office, a person who maintains a close relationship with E, etc. who is working as a violent organization in the first place of a single-person D house located in Dongdaemun-gu as well as E, etc., and Defendant B is the wife of Defendant A.

On the other hand, around December 11, 2014, F Co., Ltd. entered into the victim’s “G Urban Environment Improvement Promotion Committee” and “G Joint Implementation Agreement” and “Detailed Implementation Convention” with respect to the above implementation agreement (the content that F Co., Ltd. is responsible for executing the amount of compensation for victims to the above area) and entered into an attached agreement on the above detailed implementation agreement (the content that F reported the status of resettlement and compensation to the victim, and received project expenses after the victim’s examination) and accordingly, took charge of resettlement compensation for business establishments within G, which are expected to be redevelopment area.

D As redevelopment and improvement projects are conducted in the first place of the house development village, the committee for promotion of the urban environment rearrangement project in G (hereinafter referred to as the “promotion committee”) which is the implementer of the improvement project, was defective in securing the budget of about 20 billion won and paying business compensation, moving expenses, etc. under the name of the building owner in addition to building owners, and residents to pay business compensation, moving expenses, etc. under the name of the "civil countermeasure expenses". The Defendants were willing to receive money from the victim promotion committee by using the name of the Defendants or ASEAN, which actually operates the corporation F which has entered into a joint project implementation agreement with the above promotion committee and actually operates the said joint project with the said promotion committee.

1. Defendant B’s ASEAN committed the crime did not run a sexual traffic business establishment in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “C”), and thus, there was no eligibility to receive business compensation.