Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 28, 2016, Defendant A 20:50, on the street in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant 2016, was able to board the victim D (41 Do) E-si in front of the Southern-gu, Incheon. However, the victim was able to take away other passengers other than the Defendant into the taxi, and the victim was able to open the victim’s taxi driver’s seat in front of the signal signal, etc. and forced the victim to take up the victim’s seat from the driver’s seat, and assaulted the victim’s face by hand.

2. Defendant B, at around 21:30 on September 28, 2016, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the police officer who was arrested in the act of assault, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), at the G District District of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station G District of the Incheon Southern-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Seoul, and who was serving in the police officer who was dissatisfied with the crime of assault as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

It would be impossible to deal with the case of hump because of the arrest of the openings.

“The police officers belonging to the foregoing global belt, who were under the investigation at the foregoing global belt, sent a stroke of the police officers’ H’s neck to arms, while putting the police officers belonging to the above global belt to the brush the body confirmation form “.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and H;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 260(1)(b) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of penalty penalty)

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. In full view of the sentencing conditions shown in the trial process of this case, such as Defendant A’s age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.