Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2014, the Defendant subscribed to “B and C” as D, and deposited KRW 51,000 from the National Bank Account (F) in the name of the Defendant’s bank account (105402435294), which is the above site deposit account, using a mobile phone at the Gu’s own city E/B (B) Dong 302, and deposited KRW 51,000 from the National Bank Account (F) in the name of the Defendant’s bank account (10502435294), with the game money deposited at around 51,00,00. The Defendant deposited the game money in Korea and abroad, such as domestic and foreign cattle shed, camping, farming district, and distribution district, which are offered at the above site, and deposited KRW 605,608,000,000,000,0000 from November 24, 2015.

At the same time, the Defendant habitually stuffed with gambling, and at the same time, the Seoul Olympic Games Promotion Foundation and a person, other than an entrusted business entity, issued voting rights to promote sports or similar things, and provided property or property benefits to those who win the result.

Summary of Evidence

1. The details of the Defendant’s legal statement gambling site (B) the closure of the screen and the deposit and withdrawal transactions;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recognize dampness in light of the period, method, frequency, etc. of a crime;

1. Article 48 Subparag. 3 of the Act on the Promotion of National Sports of Korea and Article 26(1) (in all together, the use of gambling using similar activities with sports soil) as to the facts of the crime, Articles 246(2) and 246(1) of the Criminal Act (a habitually gambling);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes and reflects all of the Defendant’s errors for sentencing.

Until now, criminal punishment has no record of criminal punishment.

It is the most supported by the wife and two children, and it is again.