logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.07.17 2019가단61869
가지급금 반환 등 청구의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Presumed factual basis

A. The Plaintiff Company is a semiconductor equipment, CD equipment and parts manufacturing company, and Plaintiff B is the representative director of the Plaintiff Company.

B. The Plaintiff Company is a company established on October 17, 2012, with five employees, including G, H, I, J, and K, who had worked in D, from the company "F" that Plaintiff B supplied parts to Japan E.

Plaintiff

Around one year and six months after the incorporation of the Company was provided with funds from E companies, which are business partners, but E was unable to receive financial support as it was recovered in Korea, and operated 30% of employees' wages for about one year from early 2014.

Plaintiff

Since October 2017, the company paid the same cut portion to its employees.

C. The Defendant was a person who had worked in F by not later than 2015, and was employed as a contractual worker in relation to the Plaintiff Company’s L area dismantling project after F retirement, and was employed on October 19, 2015 as a vice head on the Plaintiff Company and retired from the office of director around August 8, 2019.

Plaintiff

around 2015, the company dismantled the inspection equipment of the 4,5, and6 D's N factories in the L area from "M to China, and took charge of the work of relocating and reinstallationing them (hereinafter "the project of this case"). The Defendant worked as the manufacturing technology team leader in the project of this case from October 2018 to May 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute or do not clearly dispute, witnessO, witness testimony by J, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the plaintiff company's claim for the return of provisional payment

A. On June 2017 to July 2017, the Plaintiff Company’s assertion 1) requested the Plaintiff Company to grant a loan of KRW 100 million, and if the loan is known, three employees (the J division, K division, and P deputy head) were to retire.

Plaintiff

Company shall be a defendant and an employee.

arrow