logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.06.21 2016고단159
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 4. 4. 23:45 경 정읍시 B에 있는 'C' 유흥 주점에서 그 곳 직원인 D에게 욕설을 하며 때리려고 하는 등 행패를 부리던 중, 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 정읍 경찰서 E 지구대 소속 경위 F이 피고인을 제지하며 귀가할 것을 요구하자, 경위 F에게 욕설을 하며 양손으로 경위 F의 몸을 밀쳤고, 이에 경위 F이 피고인을 현행 범인 체포하여 112 순찰차 량 뒷좌석에 승차시키자 의자에 누운 채 양 발로 경위 F의 복부를 3회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (a person subject to special sentencing from June to January 4) (a person subject to imprisonment with labor) [a person subject to special sentencing] of the type 1 (a person in charge of interfering with performance of official duties and coercion of duties] [a] The defendant's decision of sentence is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the crime of this case is not good for the defendant to interfere with the performance of official duties due to the defendant's desire to take a bath against the police officer dispatched from the entertainment place while he was unsatisfing a plaque at the entertainment place and exercising violence. The fact that the defendant reflects his mistake, and that there was no serious result such as injury, etc. to the victimized police officer are favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.

arrow