logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2019.05.07 2018고정94
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a line of work between the victim B ( South and 23 years of age) and the victim B.

On December 22, 2016, from around 22:00 to 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant suffered injury to the mouth of the mouth that requires treatment for about 42 days by considering the victim’s face as drinking once, on the ground that he was unable to know, after having finished a meeting in the street near the “D convenience store” located in C, and went home with the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statements made by witnesses B and the legal statements made by witnesses E in the third protocol of trial;

1. The Defendant’s argument regarding the Defendant’s assertion Nos. 5 of the medical certificate (Evidence List No. 5) does not appear to be breathn memory at the time of the instant case, but the Defendant did not have exercised violence against the victim, and the victim, who was performed a breath surgery on January 2016, was deprived of the Defendant.

In addition, it seems that there seems to have occurred alley.

However, since the victim at the time did not under the influence of alcohol differently from the defendant, the defendant in domestic affairs is unfasible.

It could be sufficiently avoided the situation where face faces directly on the ground by examining the ground in hand.

In addition, it is not clear whether the witness E, a workplace club, is the day of this case or on the following day in this court, but considering the fact that the victim states that the defendant under the influence of alcohol was able to drink the victim, the victim's statement that the defendant was a drinking face from the defendant at the time of this case has credibility, so the defendant's above assertion is rejected.

(However, while the charged facts state that the defendant's face is "three to four times" as drinking, the application of the law is recognized as being "one time" considering that the victim made a statement that he/she would face a drinking house in this court.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

arrow