logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.05.29 2014고단2895
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On May 17, 2014, the facts charged by the Defendant and C, who are relatives, were friended with the victim F(39 years of age) and the victim G(27 years of age) in front of the 'Etemotoel in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do on May 17, 2014, and were able to take a bath with the victim F(39 years of age) and the victim G(27 years of age). The Defendant was fribly taken the face of the victim F, C was fribly taken the victim’s head by drinking, and C was fribly taken the victim’s body by drinking the victim’s G face.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, inflicted injury on the victim F, such as mouth and oral surgery, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury on the victim G, which requires about five weeks of medical treatment.

2. There is no content on the face of the victim F's injury in the CCTV or witness's telephone statement made in the vicinity of the place of occurrence of the instant case.

After the occurrence of the instant case, the Defendant prepared a written statement with the content that he is flag of CCTV irrelevant to the assault, and consistently denies the fact that he was inflicted an injury upon the F until this Court.

There is part of the F's statement in the investigative agency and the court and the police statement in C as evidence that the defendant seems to have injured the F in mind, and there is a statement that the F does not contain any f's statement.

F was the front of the defendant at the time of the investigative agency and court, and C was later the right shoulder of the defendant, so it is thought that he is in such placement that he is suitable for the defendant.

Although the witness F's statement in the second trial record stated that the defendant was to display drinking to himself, the F first answer to the same question is that "the defendant was in front of the defendant, and C was subsequent thereto," but the F made a statement that he was to be asked for the same question, and that the question was given. Therefore, the first answer is made when the question was given.

arrow