logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.29 2018고단1647
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a company member.

1. On February 15, 2018, at around 04:52, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by making it 4,000,000 won of the repair cost, after he/she saws EWs EWs vehicles owned by the victim D before the “C main points” located in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, 2018.

2. On February 15, 2018, around 05:00, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, prior to the above C’s main points, at around 05:00, the Defendant reported 112 that the Defendant was assaulting with the vehicle, and sent the police box G, etc. belonging to the police box of the Suwonnam Police Station, which was called out by the Defendant, intended to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement of D and H;

1. CCTV CDs, vehicle-related photographs, and photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (for estimate of vehicle damage);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 366 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (a point of destruction), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines (a point of smoothly agreement with the victim of the crime of destruction and a point of smoothly agreement, and a fact that the defendant was fined once due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and there was no special

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow