1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2. Defendant A’s KRW 2,400,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2016, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic while operating sexual traffic establishments.

According to the above public offering, on July 2016, 2016, Defendant A leased three Moel rooms located in Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and employed female employees with the Russian nationality through broman, operated the commercial name of “F” from the time to August 2, 2016, and managed the said establishment as a general manager. Defendant B worked in the “F” for the same period, and sought the said place from the “F” to the “F”, Defendant B received KRW 1.50,00 won per day from the “2-3 customers,” and directed them to the relevant head, and had female employees act as a sexual intercourse with the customer.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the police in relation to G, and a protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect (second time, and interpretation);

1. On-site photographs, copies of suspect G pocket book, SNS translation (for reference), suspect G mobile phone number storage screen and SNS dialogue list;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (F verification report), investigation report (Compared with H and I currency details on the one hand);

1. Relevant Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Defendant A: 2,40,00 won [2, 200,00 won = 2,40,00 won x 20 days x one-day average customer per day when each co-offender is unable to confiscate money, valuables and other property acquired from such crime where several persons jointly engaged in an act, such as arranging or arranging sexual traffic, etc., the value of gains actually acquired shall be additionally collected, and where each co-offender is unable to know the amount of such individual benefits, the total amount of gains shall be equally divided and collected (see Supreme Court Decision 209Do223, May 14, 2009, etc.).