logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.30 2016나2026844
직권제적 무효 확인의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part mentioned in Paragraph 2 below, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The height of the judgment of the first instance court is amended to “after the Defendant’s intervention in the Korean Buddhist Franchiscison” in the two pages 6 and 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, and the 8 and 9 degrees “the inspection, the new inspection, and the transfer” in the 8 and 9 degrees are amended to “the succession and the transfer of the inspection,” respectively.

The phrase "the provisions" shall be added to the following at the bottom of the 7th judgment of the first instance.

The three pages of the decision of the first instance court shall be amended to "time of withdrawal".

The 7th line at the bottom of the judgment of the first instance court shall be revised to the 's new map'.

The five pages 1, 2, and 5 of the first instance judgment shall be amended as follows:

In the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, “A’s comprehensive examination of each provision of the Defendant’s Constitutional Court Order, Doctrine Law, and Doctrine Law,” “The above evidence, the entry of Gap’s evidence No. 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings,” respectively, shall be revised to “applicable facts” in the same case, and “applicable facts” in the 3rd instance of the same paragraph.

The "Rules" shall be added to the "Rules" next to the third place at the bottom of the 7th judgment of the first instance.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow