1. Defendant B’s KRW 70 million and KRW 30 million among the Plaintiff’s KRW 70 million and the Plaintiff’s KRW 40 million and KRW 40 million.

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act:

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. On January 25, 2010, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff lent KRW 70 million to Defendant B, and Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the said obligation to the Plaintiff. As such, Defendant C is jointly and severally liable to pay the loan amounting to KRW 70 million and the damages for delay.

B. We examine the judgment of the court below and evidence No. 1-2 of the evidence No. 1 cannot be used as evidence since there is no evidence to prove the authenticity of the evidence, and there is no other evidence to prove the above facts, and the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified, and the claim against the defendant C is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.