logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.03.10 2016가합157
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On February 2, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a transaction agreement, which is a joint market transaction, with B on the same day, and the Defendant, who is the wife B, is jointly and severally liable for the payment of the goods price pursuant to the above agreement, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid goods price of KRW 215,468,050. However, the Defendant’s portion out of the evidence No. 1 (a transaction agreement, which is a joint market transaction) cannot be admitted as evidence because there is no other evidence to acknowledge the authenticity, and the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow