The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects the depth of the crime, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case due to economic difficulties, and the defendant is deemed to have committed the crime of this case under the agreement with the victim R, F, H, and M, and the victim's amount of damage is not the amount of the punishment of the defendant, but the court below also determined the punishment in consideration of all the above sentencing factors.

In light of these circumstances, the crime of this case committed by the defendant, which committed a theft or attempted to steals property by intrusion upon another person's business place six times more than ten days, is very poor that the defendant committed the crime, which has been punished six times due to the crime of larceny or intrusion upon residence, etc., the victim C, J, and P did not recover damage, equity in sentencing with the same or similar case, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.