logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.04.13 2017고합196
살인미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten years.

excessive one (Evidence No. 1), one per unit (Evidence No. 2), one per unit of decline (Evidence No. 2), and one head of office.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The facts constituting the cause of the attachment order [criminal facts] The defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") are those who were sentenced to imprisonment with labor for not less than ten months at the Jeonju District Court on June 16, 2016 due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ansan Prison on January 28, 2017.

1. The motive and circumstances leading up to the Defendant’s commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the

I think that the victim had changed the phone number of the cell phone and changed the contact.

I think the victim's photograph and name were stolen, and was punished for the crime of defamation, etc. against the victim's fluences by using the victim's photograph and name. When the victim filed a complaint against the defendant, the victim committed retaliation such as intimidation and intimidation, etc., and had been sentenced to such punishment.

그에 따라 2017년 1 월경 출소 이후 피고인은 D을 통해 피해자에게 “ 니 깟 년이 뭘 할 수 있냐.

Does it be the power or loan of the investigation agency, and how it will be inside.

The inside of the Republic of Korea has threatened the victim's friendship by creating a back-to-face satis, thereby suffering from family members. The victim's friendship sent photographs, etc. D to the victim's friendship, such as hump, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, patis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis,” and satis satis, sat

“I, I begin this day,” “I,”

“The victim was threatened by threat,” and thereafter confirmed that the victim’s present location is a prior owner through the victim’s D propy photo.

2. The Defendant, in preparation for murder, thought that the Fhonam Branch of the Victim C, the father of the Victim C, thought that the Victim C’s work is the Victim C’s work, and that he was landed from his father to his former week, and that he was Jeonju.

arrow