Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for up to eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, it shall be for 2 years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in daily work, and Defendant B is a person who is employed as a used motor vehicle.

Defendant

A, in the course of operating the party room, was directed at pressure to demand debt due to borrowed money from the other party and bonds used for the repayment of the debt, etc., A transferred these circumstances to the defendant B who became aware of while finding them as the party room guest.

Accordingly, Defendant B received a certificate of employment as if he had worked for a specific company for Defendant A, and notified Defendant A of the method of providing urgency by disposing of the vehicle immediately, as if he purchased a credit in the name of Defendant A by using the certificate of employment.

After that, Defendant A requested this process to Defendant B, and Defendant B prepared a false certificate of employment that Defendant A is working for the “E” company upon request from the branch, and delivered it to Defendant A to arrange the purchase and disposal of vehicle credits.

As such, Defendant B conspired to purchase a vehicle under the name of Defendant A and Defendant A and dispose of it.

However, in fact, Defendant A did not work for a certain workplace and did not have a certain amount of income and did not have certain property, and is instructed to demand obligations, such as bonds. Therefore, even if the vehicle was purchased by means of loan or credit settlement using credit card, there was no intention or ability to pay the loan or credit card amount normally. Defendant B was well aware of these circumstances.

As above, the Defendants conspired in collusion;

1. On July 5, 2012, at the victim Hyundai Card Co., Ltd., Ltd., the fourth floor of the Hyundai Securities Building located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 6-dong 732, the defendant A submitted a false certificate of employment as to the defendant A in the name of E, which was normally prepared.