A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK5 cars.

On May 17, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:40, and proceeded ahead of Tae Young-gu, Incheon Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, with about 10km in Si-speed from Seo-gu, Seo-gu to Seo-gu Public Health Center.

At the same time, since the E T-Ra system operated by the victim D was stopped on the right side of the direction of the defendant's proceeding, there was a duty of care to safely drive the driver by accurately operating the steering system and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went ahead as it was due to negligence, and received the part before the victim's seat in front of the driver's seat in the passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant attempted to flee without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping, even after destroying and damaging the victim's van so that approximately KRW 100,000,000 of the repair cost, such as exchange by negligence in the course of business as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A statement of F and G;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the actual condition survey report, vehicle photographs, photographs of damaged vehicles, photographs of affected vehicles, photographs of affected vehicles, and written estimate submission of an investigation report (whether or not);

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime. Article 54 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant did not recognize the occurrence of an accident because of the minor collision, and since the strike did not have been scattered on the road, the defendant did not have an obligation to take measures under Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act.

그러나 ‘피고인 승용차와 피해자 승합차가 접촉할 때 울컥하는 느낌이 드는 등 충격을 느꼈다’는 취지의 D의 법정진술, '당시 서 있으면 툭 박는 느낌이 있었는데...